- how to alter the axes of domination so that those with little or no power have a seat at the table, and
- how to conceive of media (whether dominant, grassroots, or tactical) with the capacity to intervene at the level of public perception, and that can challenge the perverse manipulation of ‘facts’ about something like global warming. (Boler 2008, 11)
Whereas we now have the opportunity to both produce and consume media, there is an issue that is not addressed by social media being the answer alone. That is the disenfranchised population who don't have access to computers or the Internet in order to access social media, let alone the tools to produce any d.i.y. media. A cool not for profit is addressing this issue in an educational manner alone is One Laptop Per Child (OLPC). OLPC works to get computers to the world's poorest children in order to help them learn. Each laptop costs $199 and the program is funded through contributions. Perhaps something similar can happen regarding tools for reporting. A perfect example of this is the Skid Row Photography Club. A Los Angeles-based photographer Dave Bullock started the project in which homeless residents of L.A.’s Skid Row were given digital cameras and asked to take photos of their area. The images were then taken and displayed in galleries, showing a different perspective on what is widely thought of as an undesirable location.
I think that we still have several questions to answer regarding accessibility, truthfulness in media, and the role of social networks and whether they will in fact provide the perfect public sphere. I believe that, if we can somehow make technology and information accessible for all, then the public sphere, with equal status for all can be met.
Thanks for posting the Truthiness clip! And all the rest. I think your response really helps to hone in on the issues at hand--how to make the communication landscape more equitable so that a more robust public sphere can exist.
ReplyDelete